You should really try to be honest in your reporting. I see that this is just another propaganda far left narrative pushing site. Archer? SMFH! You couldn't even write this article from a unbiased perspective. What a joke
I read the article and I'm sorry Democrats took the high road? You aren't serious. You can't be this frikn arrogant that you don't mention the labor day rant from Mr. Waltz about hoping for "news about trump" referring to him being assassinated. How about Gavin screaming about it being time to fight and all of the countless times they have referred to Trump as wanna be Hitler. That was from the hood booga herself J. Crockett. Spare me the BS friend. You call this journalism? You must be on crack!
You know something, it's people like you that are causing this shit to happen. You call yourself a journalist😜😜 you wouldn't take the time to check your sources to make sure that what is said is absolutely true. No, you and the countless cowards like you will stop all of your research as soon as it leads you to a different conclusion than the narrative you had in mind from the begining. You see, journalism is supposed to be about reporting facts and just facts not your opinion or your view on any subject. They have word for that, hack. Example. Stephen King posting on x he wrote "he did support stoning gays" when in fact it was Charlie speaking on his podcast about someone else saying that and he went on to condemn that behavior. Some lazy ass hack in the NY times wrote a piece and later wrote a retraction and correction because of course this was false. But pompous mfr's like him won't admit they f'd up. It is you lunatic left that calls for ending the gun violence but the first thing some unhinged nut wants to do, if you aren't lock step with their beliefs is gut a gun and shoot you. Are you for real? I bet you support "gays for Palestine" movement. You should go to protest there. Let's see how they welcome you! 😂
You didn't research anything. You went on this lie telling whoever would listen to you that Charlie insulted someone because he asked a legitimate question about the mass shootings because people like you don't believe that gun violence is out of control in the inner cities like Chicago. What's wrong with that the countless black and Latino getting shot aren't victims of mass shooter? Go ahead say something you think is smart and act like you give a crap. Just like the rest of those clowns you claim took the high road. Why would Trump call Timmy boy when over and over that jackass has wished he did get assassinated and you dilusional supposed journalist said that Charlie calls out people to act violently? Or how about that Maxine Waters literally calling for people to get in there face when there at dinner with there families and tell them they aren't welcome here but you claim the opposite. Talk about projection. You can't even let people mourn without insinuating some false narrative. Vitriol?
Because I will not rush to judgement without research like you have obviously done and this is the problem in our country nowadays. No one wants to be first and foremost HONEST!
But do you see how that’s exactly what you did, rush to judgement without research? You said I didn’t verify Kirk’s statements when you hadn’t bothered looking into whether what I wrote is accurate or not
Listen you can't go around claiming that he was a perveyor of violence and vitriol without hard facts. All you did was paint a false narrative on his quotes so please don't try and play me. I may not be as learned as you as far as grammatically and such but I do know when someone is being slick and changing the actual meaning of what is being communicated by distorting the context
So let's take the last statement about the second amendment as I know a thing or two about the whole gun freak out in this country. It also requires a hell of a lot less research.
1. I see nothing that is promoting violence in this statement. I am so sure you and may others do. First off as a person who grew up in the south Bronx, I have witnessed many things that I wouldn't wish on anyone. I can tell you that more and more gun laws are useless and they won't hurt anyone but the average person that wants to protect themselves from the sick and twisted criminal that would seek to do them harm. WTF is so hard to get about this fact. Do you really believe that the sicko that wants to shoot up a school or hospital or government building etc....etc...is going to put his weapon down as soon as he reads GUN FREE ZONE on the sign? The comment he made about the gangs was to point out that fact to the person asking the question and to maybe get them to think about what no Democrat politician wants to talk about because they don't care about the people that live in those neighborhoods. I lived in those neighborhoods and I can tell you that this fact of gun crime and violence has not a fuckn thing to do with politics or political offiliation. If you ask the people of the Bronx or Brooklyn or North side Chicago they will tell you that the criminal doesn't care about any gun law.
You should really try to be honest in your reporting. I see that this is just another propaganda far left narrative pushing site. Archer? SMFH! You couldn't even write this article from a unbiased perspective. What a joke
I read the article and I'm sorry Democrats took the high road? You aren't serious. You can't be this frikn arrogant that you don't mention the labor day rant from Mr. Waltz about hoping for "news about trump" referring to him being assassinated. How about Gavin screaming about it being time to fight and all of the countless times they have referred to Trump as wanna be Hitler. That was from the hood booga herself J. Crockett. Spare me the BS friend. You call this journalism? You must be on crack!
You know something, it's people like you that are causing this shit to happen. You call yourself a journalist😜😜 you wouldn't take the time to check your sources to make sure that what is said is absolutely true. No, you and the countless cowards like you will stop all of your research as soon as it leads you to a different conclusion than the narrative you had in mind from the begining. You see, journalism is supposed to be about reporting facts and just facts not your opinion or your view on any subject. They have word for that, hack. Example. Stephen King posting on x he wrote "he did support stoning gays" when in fact it was Charlie speaking on his podcast about someone else saying that and he went on to condemn that behavior. Some lazy ass hack in the NY times wrote a piece and later wrote a retraction and correction because of course this was false. But pompous mfr's like him won't admit they f'd up. It is you lunatic left that calls for ending the gun violence but the first thing some unhinged nut wants to do, if you aren't lock step with their beliefs is gut a gun and shoot you. Are you for real? I bet you support "gays for Palestine" movement. You should go to protest there. Let's see how they welcome you! 😂
Point out what claim here was false. All of these are confirmed statements.
They maybe confirmed statements however you twisted the context of the statement! You aren't stupid
Give me a bit of time to properly research all of these claims and I will point them out.
lol so you confidently asserted I did not do my research when you have in fact not done any research
You didn't research anything. You went on this lie telling whoever would listen to you that Charlie insulted someone because he asked a legitimate question about the mass shootings because people like you don't believe that gun violence is out of control in the inner cities like Chicago. What's wrong with that the countless black and Latino getting shot aren't victims of mass shooter? Go ahead say something you think is smart and act like you give a crap. Just like the rest of those clowns you claim took the high road. Why would Trump call Timmy boy when over and over that jackass has wished he did get assassinated and you dilusional supposed journalist said that Charlie calls out people to act violently? Or how about that Maxine Waters literally calling for people to get in there face when there at dinner with there families and tell them they aren't welcome here but you claim the opposite. Talk about projection. You can't even let people mourn without insinuating some false narrative. Vitriol?
Because I will not rush to judgement without research like you have obviously done and this is the problem in our country nowadays. No one wants to be first and foremost HONEST!
But do you see how that’s exactly what you did, rush to judgement without research? You said I didn’t verify Kirk’s statements when you hadn’t bothered looking into whether what I wrote is accurate or not
Listen you can't go around claiming that he was a perveyor of violence and vitriol without hard facts. All you did was paint a false narrative on his quotes so please don't try and play me. I may not be as learned as you as far as grammatically and such but I do know when someone is being slick and changing the actual meaning of what is being communicated by distorting the context
You don’t know anything lol, you are accusing me of not having hard facts when I listed the hard facts in the damn story
So let's take the last statement about the second amendment as I know a thing or two about the whole gun freak out in this country. It also requires a hell of a lot less research.
1. I see nothing that is promoting violence in this statement. I am so sure you and may others do. First off as a person who grew up in the south Bronx, I have witnessed many things that I wouldn't wish on anyone. I can tell you that more and more gun laws are useless and they won't hurt anyone but the average person that wants to protect themselves from the sick and twisted criminal that would seek to do them harm. WTF is so hard to get about this fact. Do you really believe that the sicko that wants to shoot up a school or hospital or government building etc....etc...is going to put his weapon down as soon as he reads GUN FREE ZONE on the sign? The comment he made about the gangs was to point out that fact to the person asking the question and to maybe get them to think about what no Democrat politician wants to talk about because they don't care about the people that live in those neighborhoods. I lived in those neighborhoods and I can tell you that this fact of gun crime and violence has not a fuckn thing to do with politics or political offiliation. If you ask the people of the Bronx or Brooklyn or North side Chicago they will tell you that the criminal doesn't care about any gun law.